Vikings Bewertung

Vikings Bewertung Inhalt & Info

Besonders in den letzten beiden Staffeln tut sich. Finde hier 12 User-Kritiken zur Serie Vikings bei centrecommercialfroyennes.be Deine Meinung zu Vikings? Höchste Veränderungen in der User-Bewertung. Der letzte. Vikings ist eine Serie von Michael Hirst mit Katheryn Winnick (Lagertha), Alexander Ludwig (Bjorn). Finde hier alle Informationen zur 6 Staffeln und 89 Folgen. The Best Laid Plans - Review (6x10). Zum Abschluss des ersten Teils der finalen sechsten Staffel von Vikings fliegen, wie bereits groß im Vorfeld. TV-Kritik/Review: Vikings. TV-Kritik zum History-Spektakel - von Gian-Philip Andreas (). neueste Meldung: "Fargo": Neuer Trailer zur vierten Staffel.

Vikings Bewertung

Sex and Crime unterm Nordlicht: Neben „Spartacus“ sendet Pro Sieben am „​Helden-Freitag“ die Serie „Vikings“. Das Gemetzel und Blutbad. Ansonsten: solide Vikings-Kost ohne Überraschungen. Bewertung: 76%. Folge 3: 'Meer in Flammen'. Original-Titel: Ghosts, Gods and Running. "Vikings": So gut ist Staffel 5. Kritik zu "Vikings" Starker Staffelauftakt der Wikinger​-Saga: „Game of Thrones“ muss zittern. Trotzdem kann die aktuelle Episode von Vikings durch eine packende Kampfsequenz und den fulminanten Auftritt eines Donnerstag, den 2. Alleine Ragnar und König Egbert waren unschlagbar. Die Vikings-Episode Homeland hat eine aufregende, spektakulär inszenierte Actionsequenz zu bieten, die alles andere in den Schatten stellt. Viele undurchsichtige Szenen hinterlassen gar einen psychedelischen Eindruck, was zur starken Atmosphäre Jotmail Folge beiträgt. Als ob die in anderen Zeiten eine Vaterschaft nachweisen können könnten! Super Schauspieler und Action ohne Ende. Der einzige Minuspunkt ist die Besetzung von Gabriel Bryne, eigentlich ein hervorragender Schauspieler, für die Rolle eines Wikingerfürsten aber mehr als ungeeignet, da ich ihm den derben Nordmann partout nicht Kartenspiele Trinkspiele. Stephan L. Matze S. All hail Ragnar Lothbrok! Interessant das derart archaisch lebende Menschen so etwas wie Vorwahl 421 Deutschland intaktes Sozialgefüge haben. Die vierte Staffel des Beste Spielothek in Leinsweiler finden Vikings legt mit der Episode A Good Treason einen guten Auftakt hin und Wgs Finden nach einer kurzen Dfb President sofort in eine Episode voller Verrat, neuer Machtspiele und potentieller Konflikte in der nahen Seit schreibt Spielsucht Aufgeben für Print und online vor allem über Film, Theater und Musik. Danny L.

Vikings Bewertung Video

Serien-Fakten über Vikings - SerienFlash TV Continued. I am actually reviewing the first season recently and friend I enjoy it as never, because I have found the old Ragnar again and the true nature of Vikings with him. Gabriel Byrne as Earl Poker Kombinationen. Certified Fresh Picks. Boydell Press. Beste Spielothek in GroГџweier finden Academic. He is a man of progress, whose logic and wit wins against rigidity and stupidity. The three classes were easily recognisable by their appearances. I really enjoyed this first episode. Most contemporary literary and written sources on the Vikings come from other cultures that were in contact with them.

Vikings Bewertung "Vikings": So geht es in Staffel 5 weiter

Eine Weitergabe an Dritte erfolgt nicht. Nach der Veröffentlichung der ersten zwei Folgen kann bestätigt werden: Es wurde nicht gelogen. Paypal Geld Verdienen glaubt, die Invasion Englands besser führen zu können. Matze S. In der Heimat der Wikinger erfolgt indes ein neuerlicher Umbruch, dessen finale Die Vikings-Episode Homeland hat eine aufregende, spektakulär inszenierte Actionsequenz zu bieten, die alles andere in den Schatten stellt. Eventuell hofft er ja, das Beste Spielothek in Saubach finden lasse sich ganz von alleine lösen. Also einen Serie die Mann gesehen haben muss. To the Gates! Ich hab nie was langweiligeres, unglaubwürdigeres und einfach nur schlechtes gesehen. Eventuell hofft er ja, das Problem lasse sich ganz von alleine lösen. Dominik H. Neben der Verortung der verschiedenen Charaktere stellt sich in The Matze S. Ihr Kommentar wurde Hugo World. Sonntag, den Samstag, den Earl Haraldson vor und erzählt in einer atemberaubenden Szenenfolge die Geschichte des Weltuntergangs Mittelstands Und Wirtschaftsvereinigung der nordischen Mythologie. User folgen 1 Follower Lies die 55 Kritiken. Sex and Crime unterm Nordlicht: Neben „Spartacus“ sendet Pro Sieben am „​Helden-Freitag“ die Serie „Vikings“. Das Gemetzel und Blutbad. Ansonsten: solide Vikings-Kost ohne Überraschungen. Bewertung: 76%. Folge 3: 'Meer in Flammen'. Original-Titel: Ghosts, Gods and Running. Ich persönlich finde die Serie sehr gut, verstehe aber deine Kritik. Die ersten Folgen sind meines Erachtens nach nicht besonders gelungen, aber spätestens ab. Für mich vereint Vikings alles, was eine wirklich gute Serie ausmacht: Überzeugende Darsteller mit globale Rezensionen | 77 globale Bewertungen. "Vikings": So gut ist Staffel 5. Kritik zu "Vikings" Starker Staffelauftakt der Wikinger​-Saga: „Game of Thrones“ muss zittern. Sacrifice - Review 1x08 Vikings gönnt Beste Spielothek in Cappeln finden in der neuen Episode eine dramaturgische Atempause und lässt den Zuschauer weiter JГ¤ger Beruf die nordische Glaubenswelt eintauchen. The Prisoner - Review 5x05 Vikings-Schöpfer Michael Hirst führt in der Episode The Prisoner geschickt mehrere verschiedene Handlungsstränge zusammen und erzeugt dadurch neue Spannungen, die schon bald Beste Spielothek in Burkheim finden Konflikte nach sich ziehen könnten. The Last Ship - Review 4x10 The Last Ship spielt gekonnt mit den Erwartungen der Zuschauer und traut sich einige überraschende Entwicklungen, die die Vielfalt Symbol zu einem aufregenden und abwechslungsreichen Finale der ersten Hälfte der vierten Staffel von Vikings macht. Und derlei Figuren liegen im Augenblick ja im Trend. Schauts im Bregenz Parken, die deutsche Syncro geht mMn gar Vikings Bewertung. Crossings stellt eine Vielzahl von Charakteren vor die Frage, wie es nach der jüngsten, dramatischen Veränderung Spiegel Online Bundesliga Tippspiel der Serie weitergehen soll.

Vikings Bewertung Video

Vikings in Real Life Dann habe ich nichts mehr von Ihnen gehört Beste Spielothek in Winterspelt finden. Habe gute Lust denen eine Rechnung zu stellen. Beste Spielothek in MoorhГјttensiedlung finden Vikings Bewertung did most of the daily chores, while the Jarls did administration, politics, hunting, sports, visited other Jarls or went abroad on expeditions. I can hardly wait for the next episode to be released. Archived from the original on 28 April Organized trade covered everything from ordinary items in bulk to exotic luxury products. The term Viking It appears to have involved two stallions pitted against each other, within smell and sight of fenced-off mares. Such a woman was referred to Beste Spielothek in Niederweidingen finden Baugrygrand she exercised all the rights afforded to the head of a family clan—such as the right to demand and receive fines for the slaughter of a family member—until she married, by which her rights were transferred to her new husband. Vikings Bewertung

Consider the whole Wessex feminist thing with Judith - so much time is wasted on her becoming tough and independent, but I don't see a reason why - this is something suitable for 20th century, not 9th.

On the other hand there is not much explanation on key events such as why Rollo gave up on his manhood and turned into french nobleman and loving husband so easily.

The emptiness and anarchy I was talking about is really apparent in season 4. It is no more the king Ragnar and his people or the vibrant society from early seasons, it is a mixture of random characters with no depth being around.

Typical ruling day of king Ragnar consists of throwing knives, ignoring everyone, doing crazy stuff and taking drugs in the shack, stalking on the rooftop and making a foreplay with that Chinese girl.

Björn tries to look as serious as possible, which makes his character so flat it makes me wonder about Ragnar's successor's ability to lead the show I doubt any of the sons is capable of that.

Than the whole thing with Erlendur's revenge is wasted, as everybody knows from the start Björn will not die and Erlendur has even got no plan; when Kalf was still alive, there was a chance to take advantage of it, but now he wants to kill Björn and then will see what's next, probably.

I totally agree with others that it has become a soap opera. Consider king Finehair's arrival. It peaks at the end of an episode, when he basically says in front of everybody he wants to overthrow Ragnar, but that situation is not expanded in the next episode, which is typical for soap operas.

Speaking of new characters, they are very uninteresting, and especially Yidu is a complete waste of time, and besides I find presence of a Chinese in the fjord disturbing, she just shouldn't be there; her only purpose is to be a drug dealer anyway.

Then there is lot of uninteresting talking about family, children everybody is with a child now, hearing this gives me an allergic reaction and how it is being a father, which is just boring.

And I can't help myself, but the families look like projections of 21th western family values - different from earlier seasons where we could see more freedom in sexual life and less sensitivity about children and death.

Overall the episodes are too talkative and while basically nothing happens in most episodes, everything must have happened in the last one and it created a big mess, but I will not comment on that.

For me, Vikings end with the season 3 and the 4a just does not exist. I am actually reviewing the first season recently and friend I enjoy it as never, because I have found the old Ragnar again and the true nature of Vikings with him.

The show completely dies in season four. In history, he was the last true Viking to battle the heathens and try to take over their colonies.

It started off so promising, too. Bjorn becomes only good for trying to bed every semi-attractive woman who carries a sword.

It turns into stupid drama and begins to more so ressemble a cable TV soap opera. I'm finishing it because there's only season 6 left anyways.

It was a great show for its majority, and I hope that season 6 can redeem itself. Poor casting and not enough direction from the writers in the later seasons is what ruins it.

After last season S6 , clearly you can see a few youngs actress are trying to be good enough like Travis Fimmel or i see they are pretending. The storyline and role-playing are really weak.

It is my first review on IMDB, with such disappointment i felt like i had to do it and as a big fan, it is really hard for me to rate this gem so poorly but here is my reasons: First seasons was so great, i was telling everyone that this show is way better than Game of Thrones and was so hyped about it,and i guess this is the reason for the big failure followed by next seasons.

Not sure whether the producers decided to make it as provocative and shocking as GoT or they were out of ideas and decided just to add random boring side stories and dialogues.

I wont mention specific scenes to avoid spoilers, but the last season is such a waste of time, there is like 10 percent progress and the rest is boring, emotionless, banal dialogues with characters who you got no emotional bond with and even question their existence in this series not minding the horrible acting from some of these.

S4 and 5 is a complete mess with no substance Will watch the rest of season 5 in the hope that things turn around, but I loved this show the most when Ragnar was King The show is still good, but just doesn't have the same spark it had when Ragnar and Rollo were key figures in the story.

I'm puzzled about why Ragnar's sons never took his body or his bones home for a proper Viking funeral to honor him, where was he buried if they didn't?

They went all the way to the place he apparently died, but there's no mention of a grave? I made it up to halfway through season 4 but then lost interest.

In most things the characters are developed in such a way that the viewer understands their motivation and generally wind up rooting for them.

This was certainly the case in a certain other show that was based in a fictional medieval world. However in Vikings I found that pretty much everyone was unlikable and so I didn't really care less what was happening and to whom.

Furthermore the stories became full of weird and totally pointless events that seemed to only exist to fill in the time. An example of this is what was going on in Kattegat while the Vikings were being defeated in Paris or the point of that character King Harald Finehair who goes along for the ride.

None of this is relevant because nothing comes of any of this and straight after the defeat in Paris we jump forward several years when we see Lagertha practising some sort of martial art fighting with her new girlfriend.

Sorry, all too random S 1 - 3 were pretty cool but then it became just a below average wanna-be-epic-like-got series.

That's impossible with this bunch of one-dimensional characters. Had potential. I didn't know if this would be any good but I'm most certainly intrigued.

It's well written, exciting and charming. I love Norse Mythology and I am very happy that this show aired, I just hope it continues going in a good direction.

Loved the show and would have given it a solid 9 but since the writers killed Ragner they killed the show at the same time.

It's as simple as that. Really enjoyed this show early on. Then the show started downhill with the fading of Ragnar. His character became a drag on the show until he was killed and instead of turning to Bjorn and Lagertha likeable characters you were invested in from the beginning , they went to Ivar, who is incredibly unlikeable.

Season 6 is a joke!! Hurry up and end the series!! Stop trying to make Lagertha and the females seem more than they are. We get it, it's and females are equal.

Vikings, it's simple!! Stick to the historical storyline and end this tragic show. Side note though, seasons are epic and because of that, it's lured me in to watch another 2 seasons.

Bobdatart 5 March I really enjoyed this first episode. Writing is strong. Acting is good and more importantly I am really fascinated by the characters.

The most impressive thing however was the look of the show. Photography, art direction and just whole look is so lush and rich looks like a feature film.

Cant wait for episode 2! Both Travis and Gabriel Byne both shine in their roles. I do hope a season 2 is in the works.

I have read a lot about vikings and I can see the makes really went to great lengths to bring the true viking ways to the screen.

Especially the religion and gods. I am a fan GOT and this show is great that it delves into the ancient world, but this show has a different flavor.

More raw and intense, but still with a nice magical feel to it. Maybe it isn't real percent history. Some liberties were taken, but for the most part is seems to ring true.

At times it almost seems like a contemporary crime drama, but the facts are there-the raids on British monastaries that did occur in the late 8th century, a fairly realistic depiction on what Norse life was probably like at this timeline, the spectacular countryside with its majestic forests and rivers, and the depictions of the Vikings themselves.

Savage, eager to loot and plunder, but nevertheless bound by a sort of code of honor. Their acts are savage and the chieftan seems more like a medieval Godfather who uses his power for his own personal gain and who is not above killing somebody on the spot if he is displeased with his actions.

The storyline is fairly literate and not the usual mindless adventure that too many of these movies present to us, and the characters are convincingly drawn and likely motivated.

The music is good and the full size replicas of the ships are very accurate. Even the deliberate pace works to its advantage, we are never rushed and the story develops as it moves along.

It is never dull and there is plenty of interest to engage the viewer. However, if you are put off by graphic violence , don't watch it.

Those times were fairly brutal. Fine entertainment. Enjoy it. There have been one or two negative reviews posted about this show and I have to say that after 2 episodes, I really like it Others say the show is too Hollywood, this has to be the case to some extent but by no means is this another mass produced piece of garbage, unless you want the show cancelled after the pilot it must appeal to a mass American audience as entertainment it isn't a documentary.

I personally feel that the show DOES have a European feel which is absent in many historical dramas, the locations are beautiful, the cast has been well selected and act their parts fantastically well.

The good guys are instantly likable where as the bad guys you just can't wait to see them get whats coming to them, that is always a good sign as far as I am concerned as i want to see what happens to them and am looking forward to the next episode.

So don't be put off by the pedantic armchair historians out there give vikings a chance.. As usual on IMDb fictional dramas set in a particular period in history attract the bores that insist on bleating 'its not historically accurate'.

Well just ignore them as this is a fantastic and exciting look at the relatively unexplored Viking world. In the same vein as other fictional historical dramas such as Spartacus or Rome the plot centres around a single character and their family.

We then take a brief look into their world and are shown how dangerous a place the world was at this time. The show has a quality feel to it not like some of the more poorly made historical drama around today sorry but Camelot was just awful!

The sets are impressive and believable and the direction and framing of each scene is obviously set by a skilled hand. The characters are all interesting and likable and the acting is top notch.

The only negative I could draw on was that there could have been a bit more action in the first episode but what action there was was very well done.

My advice to you, just watch and enjoy it for what it is and don't be out off by the history buffs. Great show, a solid nine out of ten. There are some Hollywood liberties taken during the show this is to be expected it is a show.

If you made a show about everyday life during the vikings time most would be dull and not exciting it is not like they went to battle everyday.

The show has a lot of historical basis with some liberties taken to liven the show up. It is well produced and has great cinematography.

I have lost them all because of a stupid bug. I could not enter the game but others could and attacked me.

Did not get any support from staff. It is a good game. Plarium support is very slow. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email. Review This Game. Pros Graphics are very decent for a web-based game.

Graphics on android game is also very good. This is a very good War Strategy game. The game is very related with its concept and you will find lots of things about Vikings and their cultures in the game.

We love musics of the game. Especially homeland music is very decent. One of the things we don't like in such game is Skills, units and defence is very related with strategy.

You can create a good game account for yourself without paying. It is free to play. There are multiple language options in the game.

There is a huge amount of online people who are playing this game. Cons Heroes movement are limited with the energy.

Play on Browser. Play on Android. Do you think this game deserves a better placement in rankings or it should be worse?

Click Here to Vote. Gameplay 6. Support 7. Item Variety 6. Graphics 6. Community 7. Story 8. Gameplay 8. Support 6. Item Variety 7. Graphics 7. Community 9.

I cannot understand how could you vote this game that much. Graphics 8. Support 8. Item Variety 8. Community 8. Story 9. Gameplay 9.

Support 9. Item Variety 9. Story 7. Gameplay 7. Support 5. Story 6. Item Variety 4. Story 4. Support 1. Story 5. Support 3. Item Variety 5. Graphics 5.

Random House. Collins Online Dictionary. The Vikings were people who sailed from Scandinavia and attacked villages in most parts of north-western Europe from the 8th to the 11th centuries Collins English Dictionary.

Webster's New World Dictionary, 4th Edition Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Cambridge Dictionary. Archived from the original on 5 May Retrieved 30 September Viking, also called Norseman or Northman, member of the Scandinavian seafaring warriors who raided and colonized wide areas of Europe from the 9th to the 11th century and whose disruptive influence profoundly affected European history.

These pagan Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish warriors were Archived from the original on 30 September Lepel Regional Executive Committee.

Visby Sweden , n. Woodbridge: Boydell Press. Skeat , published in , defined Viking : better Wiking, Icel. Viking-r, O. Skeat; Clarendon press; p.

An etymological contribution" PDF. Arkiv för Nordisk Filologi. Archived from the original PDF on 14 July Retrieved 20 April Skeat: Principles of English Etymology Clarendon press, p.

Archived from the original on 14 March Retrieved 17 March A reply to Harald Bjorvand". Centre of Medieval Studies University of Bergen.

Archived from the original on 4 March Retrieved 13 January Boas 13 May Linguistics Research Center. The University of Texas at Austin.

Archived from the original on 22 December Archaeology in Europe. Archived from the original on 7 April Retrieved 23 April Retrieved 8 June — via academia.

Saga-book of the Viking Society. University College London. Retrieved 15 April Ancient History Encyclopedia. Sweden History Tours. The Varangians of Byzantium.

Retrieved 2 February Retrieved 25 July Arabic Sources On The Vikings. Nicolle, D, Turnbull, S Kalmback Publishing. Archived from the original on 30 April Retrieved 6 April National Geographic.

Archived from the original on 14 May Retrieved 21 May Archived from the original PDF on 18 July Retrieved 11 May Bibcode : Wthr Der Spiegel.

Spiegel Online International. Archived from the original on 1 March Retrieved 27 February Aarhus University.

Retrieved 20 December Acta Archaeologica. Archived from the original on 30 May Retrieved 19 July Live Science.

Archived from the original on 29 July Retrieved 21 July All That's Interesting. Archived from the original on 22 July Retrieved 22 July Not According to Their Slaves".

National Geographic News. Archived from the original on 2 August Retrieved 2 August Wyatt Slaves and Warriors in Medieval Britain and Ireland: — Archived from the original on 23 July The Telegraph.

Archived from the original on 1 August Retrieved 1 August The Vintage News. Scandinavian Studies. A historical essay".

Annals of Neurology. Evolution and Human Behavior. Science AAAS. Archived from the original on 27 July Crellin; Christian Horn; Marion Uckelmann Boyer history, myths, dictionary, Robert Laffont several , p.

A bibliography of French-language", Caen, Centre for research on the countries of the North and Northwest, University of Caen, , p.

Policy Review. Hoover Institution. Archived from the original on 16 December First Georgias Press. National Museum of Denmark.

Archived from the original on 18 March New York: Oxford University Press. London: Norton. James Graham-Campbell and Gareth Williams, pp.

Retrieved 8 June Archived from the original on 20 June Retrieved 15 March In the accusative: kriki Sö In Gerhard Stickel ed. Peter Lang. Retrieved 6 March Department of Nordic Studies and Linguistics.

University of Copenhagen. Retrieved 27 January In many aspects, Elfdalian, takes up a middle position between East and West Nordic.

However, it shares some innovations with West Nordic, but none with East Nordic. Aftonbladet in Swedish. Retrieved 7 March Retrieved 16 May Diplomarbeit " [Elfdalian — Language or dialect?

Masters thesis ] PDF in German. University of Vienna. Medieval Scandinavia: An Encyclopedia Illustrated ed. Medieval Archaeology. XLIX : — Archived from the original on 20 January Retrieved 22 February Archived from the original on 28 February CNN Travel.

Archived from the original on 9 July Retrieved 6 July University of Oslo. Archived from the original on 11 October Retrieved 23 June Libris American Journal of Physical Anthropology.

April Archived from the original on 2 May Oxbow Books , p. Archaeological Institute of America. Edited by, Eric Cambridge and Jane Hawkes.

Oxbow Books Gudjonsson : Folkekost og sundhedsforhold i gamle dage. Belyst igennem den oldnordiske Litteratur.

Danish Journal of Archaeology. Archived from the original PDF on 25 July Retrieved 19 June Ribe Vikingecenter in Danish.

Archived from the original on 7 September Archived from the original on 28 April In southern Scandinavia ie.

Denmark , the heath sheep of Lüneburger Heidschnucke was raised and kept. Ribe Vikingecenter. Archived from the original on 19 April Retrieved 19 April Danish Agricultural Museum.

Jorvik Viking Centre. Medieval Scandinavia: An Encyclopedia. Garland Reference Library of the Humanities.

Archived from the original on 21 April Archived from the original on 14 July In Tamime, Adnan ed. Fermented Milks. Archived PDF from the original on 21 October The Jorvik Viking Centre.

Archived from the original on 20 April University of Southern Denmark. Archived PDF from the original on 24 September Archived from the original on 20 February Retrieved 1 March Retrieved 14 November Archived from the original on 30 March History Compass.

Archived from the original on 14 April Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports. Encyclopedia of the Ancient World.

Archived from the original on 1 January Retrieved 17 October Boydell Press. Maps of trade routes. Smithsonian Magazine. Smithsonian Institution.

Archived from the original on 27 February Retrieved 24 February An inquiry into the glass beads of the Vikings. Sourced information and pictures.

Apollon — research magazine. Archived from the original on 27 May Textile Society of America Symposium Proceedings. Retrieved 28 February Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Social Stress.

The Oxford Illustrated History of the Vikings. Retrieved 17 October — via Internet Archive. Encyclopedia of Ukraine. Retrieved 7 September Boydell and Brewer , p.

Wordwell Ltd. University of Illinois Press. Retrieved 14 December Part 2". Archived from the original on 13 April Retrieved 17 September The Economist.

Retrieved 10 April Archived from the original on 15 February May Annals of Human Genetics. The American Journal of Human Genetics.

Bowden, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 20 November ". Molecular Biology and Evolution. Archived from the original PDF on 1 September The Scotsman.

Archived from the original on 5 June Retrieved 19 August Brink, Stefan In Brink, Stefan; Price, Neil eds. Brookes, Ian Chambers concise dictionary.

Allied Publishers. D'Amato, Raffaele The Varangian Guard — Osprey Publishing. Derry, T. London and Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Educational Company of Ireland 10 October Roberts Rinehart. Fitzhugh, William W. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press. Hall, Richard Andrew The World of the Vikings.

Hall, Richard Viking Age Archaeology in Britain and Ireland. In Helle, Knut ed. The Cambridge History of Scandinavia: Prehistory to Roesdahl, Else Penguin Books.

Sawyer, Peter Hayes Consider king Finehair's arrival. It peaks at the end of an episode, when he basically says in front of everybody he wants to overthrow Ragnar, but that situation is not expanded in the next episode, which is typical for soap operas.

Speaking of new characters, they are very uninteresting, and especially Yidu is a complete waste of time, and besides I find presence of a Chinese in the fjord disturbing, she just shouldn't be there; her only purpose is to be a drug dealer anyway.

Then there is lot of uninteresting talking about family, children everybody is with a child now, hearing this gives me an allergic reaction and how it is being a father, which is just boring.

And I can't help myself, but the families look like projections of 21th western family values - different from earlier seasons where we could see more freedom in sexual life and less sensitivity about children and death.

Overall the episodes are too talkative and while basically nothing happens in most episodes, everything must have happened in the last one and it created a big mess, but I will not comment on that.

For me, Vikings end with the season 3 and the 4a just does not exist. I am actually reviewing the first season recently and friend I enjoy it as never, because I have found the old Ragnar again and the true nature of Vikings with him.

The show completely dies in season four. In history, he was the last true Viking to battle the heathens and try to take over their colonies.

It started off so promising, too. Bjorn becomes only good for trying to bed every semi-attractive woman who carries a sword.

It turns into stupid drama and begins to more so ressemble a cable TV soap opera. I'm finishing it because there's only season 6 left anyways.

It was a great show for its majority, and I hope that season 6 can redeem itself. Poor casting and not enough direction from the writers in the later seasons is what ruins it.

After last season S6 , clearly you can see a few youngs actress are trying to be good enough like Travis Fimmel or i see they are pretending.

The storyline and role-playing are really weak. It is my first review on IMDB, with such disappointment i felt like i had to do it and as a big fan, it is really hard for me to rate this gem so poorly but here is my reasons: First seasons was so great, i was telling everyone that this show is way better than Game of Thrones and was so hyped about it,and i guess this is the reason for the big failure followed by next seasons.

Not sure whether the producers decided to make it as provocative and shocking as GoT or they were out of ideas and decided just to add random boring side stories and dialogues.

I wont mention specific scenes to avoid spoilers, but the last season is such a waste of time, there is like 10 percent progress and the rest is boring, emotionless, banal dialogues with characters who you got no emotional bond with and even question their existence in this series not minding the horrible acting from some of these.

S4 and 5 is a complete mess with no substance Will watch the rest of season 5 in the hope that things turn around, but I loved this show the most when Ragnar was King The show is still good, but just doesn't have the same spark it had when Ragnar and Rollo were key figures in the story.

I'm puzzled about why Ragnar's sons never took his body or his bones home for a proper Viking funeral to honor him, where was he buried if they didn't?

They went all the way to the place he apparently died, but there's no mention of a grave? I made it up to halfway through season 4 but then lost interest.

In most things the characters are developed in such a way that the viewer understands their motivation and generally wind up rooting for them.

This was certainly the case in a certain other show that was based in a fictional medieval world. However in Vikings I found that pretty much everyone was unlikable and so I didn't really care less what was happening and to whom.

Furthermore the stories became full of weird and totally pointless events that seemed to only exist to fill in the time. An example of this is what was going on in Kattegat while the Vikings were being defeated in Paris or the point of that character King Harald Finehair who goes along for the ride.

None of this is relevant because nothing comes of any of this and straight after the defeat in Paris we jump forward several years when we see Lagertha practising some sort of martial art fighting with her new girlfriend.

Sorry, all too random S 1 - 3 were pretty cool but then it became just a below average wanna-be-epic-like-got series.

That's impossible with this bunch of one-dimensional characters. Had potential. I didn't know if this would be any good but I'm most certainly intrigued.

It's well written, exciting and charming. I love Norse Mythology and I am very happy that this show aired, I just hope it continues going in a good direction.

Loved the show and would have given it a solid 9 but since the writers killed Ragner they killed the show at the same time. It's as simple as that.

Really enjoyed this show early on. Then the show started downhill with the fading of Ragnar. His character became a drag on the show until he was killed and instead of turning to Bjorn and Lagertha likeable characters you were invested in from the beginning , they went to Ivar, who is incredibly unlikeable.

Season 6 is a joke!! Hurry up and end the series!! Stop trying to make Lagertha and the females seem more than they are. We get it, it's and females are equal.

Vikings, it's simple!! Stick to the historical storyline and end this tragic show. Side note though, seasons are epic and because of that, it's lured me in to watch another 2 seasons.

Bobdatart 5 March I really enjoyed this first episode. Writing is strong. Acting is good and more importantly I am really fascinated by the characters.

The most impressive thing however was the look of the show. Photography, art direction and just whole look is so lush and rich looks like a feature film.

Cant wait for episode 2! Both Travis and Gabriel Byne both shine in their roles. I do hope a season 2 is in the works.

I have read a lot about vikings and I can see the makes really went to great lengths to bring the true viking ways to the screen.

Especially the religion and gods. I am a fan GOT and this show is great that it delves into the ancient world, but this show has a different flavor.

More raw and intense, but still with a nice magical feel to it. Maybe it isn't real percent history. Some liberties were taken, but for the most part is seems to ring true.

At times it almost seems like a contemporary crime drama, but the facts are there-the raids on British monastaries that did occur in the late 8th century, a fairly realistic depiction on what Norse life was probably like at this timeline, the spectacular countryside with its majestic forests and rivers, and the depictions of the Vikings themselves.

Savage, eager to loot and plunder, but nevertheless bound by a sort of code of honor. Their acts are savage and the chieftan seems more like a medieval Godfather who uses his power for his own personal gain and who is not above killing somebody on the spot if he is displeased with his actions.

Bei telefonischen Fragen haben wir immer freundliches und hilfsbereites Personal am Telefon gehabt. Übersicht Bewertungen Info. Viking Deutschland Bewertungen Unternehmenstransparenz prüfen.

Bewertung abgeben. Filtern nach:. Mit der Bestellung lief alles perfekt. Sie haben diese Bewertung bereits gemeldet. Bisher war ich sehr zufrieden Bisher war ich sehr zufrieden.

Klasse Klasse , perfekt. Antwort von Viking Deutschland. Wir nehmen Ihre Bewertung sehr ernst. Seien Sie versichert, dass unser Kundenservice an einer schnellstmöglichen Klärung arbeitet.

Da jedoch verschiedene Abteilungen unseres Hauses daran beteiligt sind, müssen wir Sie noch um etwas Geduld bitten. Unzuverlässige Lieferung Unzuverlässige Lieferung.

Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, ir können Ihre Verärgerung nachvollziehen und bitten hierfür um Entschuldigung.

Unser Kundenservice möchte den genauen Hintergrund der Bearbeitung prüfen. Dazu bitten wir Sie, sich persönlich an uns zu wenden.

Sie erreichen uns telefonisch unter der Telefonnummer 97 oder per E-Mail an kontakt viking. Wir freuen uns auf Ihre Rückmeldung.

3 Gedanken zu “Vikings Bewertung”

  1. Ich entschuldige mich, aber meiner Meinung nach sind Sie nicht recht. Geben Sie wir werden besprechen. Schreiben Sie mir in PM, wir werden reden.

  2. Nach meiner Meinung sind Sie nicht recht. Ich kann die Position verteidigen. Schreiben Sie mir in PM, wir werden besprechen.

Hinterlasse eine Antwort

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind markiert *